- Reclaiming the Urban Memory: The Great Recession, climate change and the quest for carbon neutrality have reoriented how we look at cities, the distance between home and work, and the role of the automobile. (My Urbanist)
- Designing for the Non-Architect : Don’t the millions of people who have no architecture or related education deserve to enjoy buildings as much as designers do? (Urban Times)
- Why doesn’t the public health community get it about walkability? Finding the synergies between, say, smart growth and health to forge a more holistic approach to our environmental well-being is what sustainable communities should be about (NRDC Switchboard)
- Our Mobile Money Pits: The True Cost of Cars: Transportation swallows one out of every five dollars earned by the average American family, double the bite it took in 1960. (DC StreetsBlog)
- Top 50 Urban Policy Wonk Bloggers and Top Twitter Feeds on Urban Planning. This double feature contains links to some of the best blogs and twitter feeds for people interested in our urban fabric. (Public Servant Blog/Planetizen)
Thanks for being a regular reader of my site!
- Screenshot
Canadian based rock band Arcade Fire is one of those indie bands that has buck the trend instead of selling out or watering down as they get bigger they just keeps getting better. This week they introduced a revolutionary new music video format.
The Wilderness Downtown uses a mashup of Google’s Street View, HTML5 video and some impressive overlays to create a multimedia viewing experience. All you need to do is input the address you grew up in and it will build an immersive film by director Chris Milk with Arcade Fire‘s “We Used To Wait” around it.
I recommend watching it as soon as possible. While it is not perfect (few pioneering experiments are), it is an extremely cool idea put into action.

Screenshot via designboom.com
The video is especially powerful for me, as the move I grew up in, is the home I watched my first music video in and this memory is only strengthened by the nostalgic atmosphere of the video.
Caveat: The clip requires Google Chrome (or a fully HTML5 Compliant browser). If you aren’t already using it, you really should be, so use this opportunity to download it! Also, for best results, close as many running programs as possible, all the interactive goodness taxes even the speediest processors.
We Used to Wait is found on Arcade Fire’s latest album, The Suburbs. The entire album has an urban planning theme, which makes it all the more awesome. Canadian, interactive AND urbanist, what more could I want!?!
‘Mixed-use’ is one of the most over-used, yet most misunderstood phrases in urban development. In recent years, ‘mixed-use buildings’ has become the new planning dogma, just like ‘specialized buildings’ was before it.
Many cities have invested a lot of money in developing mixed-use buildings, streets and neighborhoods, but haven’t achieved the urban vibrancy they want. This is often times because their underlying urban fabric remains coarse (i.e. large and monotonous).
In most new urbanist mixed-use developments the residential units are often all high-end condos and the retail is usually a series of chain stores. Moreover, little in the neighborhood is more than a few years old. Thus, although the uses may seem mixed, the culture is monolithic. At the same time, many arts districts face the same fate of attracting monolithic culture (albeit completely different from the previous example). A block of live work galleries doesn’t make for a vibrant neighborhood bur rather an artists ghetto.
Looking for a Phx
In downtown Phoenix, these two extremes are seen in the artist collectives and bars that have functioned, but never flourished along Grand Ave for the past decade or so on one hand; and the monotonous collection of upper middle-class restaurants and retail outlets being rolled out at CityScape on the other.
The reason that these types of mixed-use areas fail to live up to expectation is that they are too economically—and therefore, functionally limited—to be lively, interesting and convenient for a range of people. They lack the intermingling of class and functionality that offer the stimulation and interest essential to a vibrant urban core.
So the question remains: If mixed-use isn’t the answer, what it?
Urban Diversity
Perhaps a better way of looking at mixed use, is ‘diversity’. This was a basis tenant of Jane Jacobs in her classic tome, The Death and Life and Great American Cities. Diversity, according to Jacobs, isn’t simply a mix of uses but an integration of business types:
“True diversity requires the “mingling of high yield middling yield, low yield, and no-yield enterprises” —Jane Jacobs
To me, “mixed use” means more than mixing residential and commercial. It also means proximity to other uses like schools/universities, parks, museums, courthouses, industries, meditation, train stations, etc. The reality is that not every building needs to have multiple uses or tenants but each block should and each neighborhood must.
These kinds of destinations help to define a city’s identity. They do so through the variety of uses and public spaces that highlight local assets and unique talents and skills of the community—educational, cultural, and commercial—that are all open and available to all visitors to enjoy for free.
Such neighborhoods allow residents to visit, become involved and stay awhile. They are not defined by architecture, but rather the uses that are front and center and the buildings and design elements that support them.
Replacing Mixed with Multiple
“It is fatal to specialize… the more diverse we are in what we can do the better.” —Jane Jacobs
Perhaps then it is time to move beyond the simple concept of ‘mixed use’ to a more robust style of development. The time of simply thinking of urban development as “Starbucks over condos, maybe with a train that comes every day” has passed.
Instead we need to start thinking of creating neighborhoods that build authentic places through multiple uses that are intimately related, interconnected and interdependent. After all, true urban diversity comes from the relationships between uses, tenants, and the organizations within a place.
Yesterday, I introduced the concept of ‘genius loci.’ Today, I’d like to begin to explore it’s practical application in cities.
Every place has its own unique qualities, not only in terms of its physical makeup, but of how it is perceived. As I discussed yesterday, these unique qualities help make up the genius loci of a place. In principle, it is the responsibility of the stewards of the city—whether they be politicians planners, business owners or developers—to be sensitive to these qualities and strive to enhance them.
Alas, too often in the ‘real world’ these same people work to destroy them. Rather than adapting their visions to the genius of their place, they try to force their own vision (usually a vision borrowed from another place) on the city. These so-called stewards are preoccupied with the physical lens of the city and concentrate only on its built form, neglecting what makes their city special.
Indeed, these leaders need to take a step back and begin to appreciate residents use the streets and spaces of their city from hour-to-hour, day-to-day and throughout the year. They need to do a better jobs honoring the resident spirit of a place and understand how residents, from ALL walks of life interact with the city and have adapted their daily patterns to what already exists. By doing so, it is possible to create a powerful genius loci in almost any neighborhood, and indeed with almost every project on almost any property.
Building a strong genius loci in a city or neighborhood begins by paying attention to the spirit of place already there. Rather than pointing to a place on a map and planning to build something solely because the property is available, affordable or conveniently located, it is important to consider what already exists. The first step, therefore, is to find the abiding character that inhabits the site—no matter how subtle.
A sensitivity to what is already there tells you what would be appropriate or inappropriate when planning and deciding what should be added. The character and atmosphere of the neighborhood or surrounding properties and any existing building styles are often as important as the planned use and design for the site. Aspects as varied as the surrounding land, the history of the neighborhood or district, and how the property interfaces with the larger geographic area all need to be considered, and indeed should offer the starting point and creative inspiration for any development.
Coming soon: One area where the City of Phoenix is making progress in developing ‘genius loci.’
Do you have a favorite place in the city or your hometown? What characteristics makes it special or memorable? Can you name any recent developments, here or elsewhere that have done a good job at incorporating an existing ‘spirit of place’?
Related articles by Zemanta
- ping genius loci (designboom.com)
- What is Genius Loci? (yuriartibise.com)
Usually I have a hard time whittling down my weekly reading list to just five. This week I didn’t have a problem. Not because there weren’t tons of great articles out there, but because I haven’t had a chance to read as much. Here are about the only five articles I read this week (although they are all excellent
):
- Consequential Strangers: A review of a book that looks at why the people we take for granted like our car mechanic, the bakery clerk and the fellow dog-walkers at the park, are actually more important people in our lives than we may imagine.
- Bill Gates Is Wrong As Usual: To Mac addicts like me, this title may not be shocking, but the reason just may be. This post looks at why Gates’ recent TED presentation was wrong-headed and potentially dangerous to the climate change movement.
- Can We Design Cities for Happiness: another way at looking at urban success. Key passage: “Economics, urban planning, ecology are only the means. Happiness is the goal”.
- The 10% Solution: The post links to one of the best articles I’ve read on urban strategy in a long while. It is a great reminder at how seemingly modest goals can have transformative impacts. I will be following up on this concept and how it applies to Phoenix in the near future
- Getting to Yes on Open Data: This article appealed to the policy wonk in me. Open Data could be a game changer in how cities services are delivered, as well as increase accountability, and, ultimately, increased trust with our local governments.
This is day 24 in my 28 Day Blogging Challenge. 4 days to go.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Urban Savoir-Faire (yuriartibise.com)
- CityScape: Suburbanizing Downtown Phoenix (yuriartibise.com)
- What is Placemaking? (yuriartibise.com)













![Genius Loci in Practice Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_c.png?x-id=599fb02f-878e-4be1-b3c2-744d201fe476)



![Recommend [YuriArtibise]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/logo-recommend-badge-large.png)
Yelp
SlideShare
Picasa
Last
FriendFeed
brightkite
MyBlogLog
Twitter
LinkedIn
StumbleUpon
Myspace
Facebook
Digg
Delicious
Youtube
Reddit
Flickr
Plaxo
Recent Comments